<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking about strategy &#187; value chain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimwarren.com/tag/value-chain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimwarren.com</link>
	<description>with Kim Warren</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>McKinsey &#8216;business system&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/mckinsey-business-system/</link>
		<comments>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/mckinsey-business-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mckinsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance over time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value chain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McK gives useful short videos in its &#8216;enduring ideas&#8217; series. The latest I&#8217;ve viewed on the business system is a helpful reminder of the old value-chain concept, though it is disappointingly qualitative, even in the &#8216;How to conduct a good analysis&#8217; section.  In fact, value-chain is a better term for what the video describes.If the term &#8216;system&#8217; [as <a href='http://kimwarren.com/strategy/mckinsey-business-system/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McK gives useful short videos in its &#8216;enduring ideas&#8217; series. The latest I&#8217;ve viewed on the <a href="http://e.mckinseyquarterly.com/W0RT00A47F91D301F2E302D522DF70" target="_blank">business system</a> is a helpful reminder of the old value-chain concept, though it is disappointingly qualitative, even in the &#8216;How to conduct a good analysis&#8217; section.  In fact, value-chain is a better term for what the video describes.<span id="more-689"></span>If the term &#8216;system&#8217; [as dictionaries suggest] means a group of interacting, interdependent elements forming a complex whole that <em>behaves</em> in some way, then an adequate system description of a business would show how the system&#8217;s performance changes over time. In fact, I&#8217;m not sure the term &#8216;system&#8217; has any meaning in the absence of the passing of time? </p>
<p>The old value-chain may help show how costs and activities are traded off between parts of the system, but says nothing about how that system will perform over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/mckinsey-business-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

