There is a ton of academic stuff on this, but our dynamics terminology can be quite exact about it.

To “adapt” implies building specific resources and capabilities that previously did not exist. For example, a current client is trying to move from a hardware-sales focus to a “solution-provider”. They need to design solutions for distinct markets they serve (a solution = the hardware + control systems + ongoing support). Creating these solutions is a capability they currently do not have. Nor do they have the people (in sales, design, project mgmt) to start developing that capability.

We can specify not only the numbers of such people needed, but also the rate at which they can be hired or developed, the rate at which *they* can then build solutions, the numbers of potential customers those solutions can be sold to, the rate at which those potential customers can be developed, and thus how costs, sales and profits can grow over time – to get to a cash-flow forecast from this strategic initiative.

One specially useful case where resource attributes arise is when one resource brings access to other potential resources, most often customers…
Continue reading »
It is not easy to understand and manage changes in attributes and the impact of those changes. Strategy must recognize and cope with change over time, so needs a method for quantifying both scale and speed of progress. Now we must not only work out how key resources are changing, but also the quality of those resources.
How is this done?
Continue reading »
The briefings up to this point have put together the basic elements of the simple core system of how an organization functions and delivers performance that changes over time. This picture with numerical information on its performance is often enough to see big improvement opportunities. However, there is much more opportunity to use strategy dynamics to improve performance…
Continue reading »
The flows in and out of a resource (the rates at which it grows or declines) depend on existing resourcesmore sales people should lead to customers being won more quickly, for example.

There are two special cases of this dependency that are both very common and important…
What are they?

Continue reading »
A devastating implication arises from this interdependency between resources from the previous briefing. Here is a simple story…
Continue reading »
There is one last thing to do before going on to the implications and uses of resource-accumulation.
Sorry – but it’s just got to be done right! If you get this wrong, everything else you try to do with strategy dynamics will be messed up.

Continue reading »

The previous briefing explained that accumulating resources are important.
So now we need to understand how to work out the result when it happens.

Continue reading »

At one level, Resource Accumulation may seem rather simple and obvious.
So what?’ you may ask yourself.
Well, it’s monumentally, massively important, and while it may be obvious in itself, its consequences are truly staggering.
The next few briefings are going to talk a lot about ‘accumulating resources’.

Continue reading »

What would be a useful checklist of tangible resources?

customers, products, production capacity, staff and cash.

Since organizations exist to “supply” some form of “demand,” let’s look at demand-side resources first…

Continue reading »

© 2012 Talking about strategy Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha