<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking about strategy &#187; knowledge management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimwarren.com/tag/knowledge-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimwarren.com</link>
	<description>with Kim Warren</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Chief Performance Officer?</title>
		<link>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/chief-performance-officer/</link>
		<comments>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/chief-performance-officer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Performance Officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silo management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davenport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice simple observation from Tom Davenport on this idea, in particular asking if the new role might help end silo management. Starting from the need to make knowledge management [KM] a core of some other function [e.g. HR] people on Tom&#8217;s events have suggested going further and linking KM to business processes to technology etc. Good <a href='http://kimwarren.com/strategy/chief-performance-officer/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice simple <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/davenport/2009/05/the_rise_of_the_chief_performa.html?cm_mmc=npv-_-WEEKLY_HOTLIST-_-MAY_2009-_-HOTLIST0519" target="_blank">observation from Tom Davenport</a> on this idea, in particular asking if the new role might help end silo management. <span id="more-694"></span></p>
<p>Starting from the need to make knowledge management [KM] a core of some other function [e.g. HR] people on Tom&#8217;s events have suggested going further and linking KM to business processes to technology etc. Good principles, but three challenges to making it a reality- the concepts are abstract, the relationships unkown, and the list incomplete [what about capabilities, resources and finance?] .. precisely the challenge for which I hope strategy dynamics offers a way forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/chief-performance-officer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More executive sense on &#8216;knowledge&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/more-executive-sense-on-knowledge/</link>
		<comments>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/more-executive-sense-on-knowledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harald Borner, global head of talent at SAP points out that they have every conceivable technology tool to collect and share knowledge, and help people find out anything they may need to know  &#8230; but none of that counts if people aren&#8217;t motivated and skilled to access and make use of it. He also points out <a href='http://kimwarren.com/strategy/more-executive-sense-on-knowledge/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harald Borner, global head of talent at SAP points out that they have every conceivable technology tool to collect and share knowledge, and help people find out anything they may need to know <span id="more-237"></span> &#8230; but none of that counts if people aren&#8217;t motivated and skilled to access and make use of it. He also points out that there can be too much of a good thing &#8211; lots of discussion groups, Wikis etc etc get going but people just don&#8217;t take part. Seems most are too busy responding to the direct work pressures they are under.</p>
<p>Thorsten Huebschen of Microsoft admits we are still not at the point people can instantly find what they want &#8211; even inside M&#8217;soft! Also, they are working to find ways of capturing information from the &#8216;long tail&#8217; of people who know small but potentially very valuable information. ['long tail' as originally used refers to very low-volume products in an extensive product range, but I get what he means]</p>
<p>A bit of a disagreement, though &#8211; Philip Evans snr VP with BCG offered that customers can tell you what they want, so it&#8217;s important to be close to them &#8230; but this morning&#8217;s speaker, head of Innovation at Deutsche Telecom emphasised that customers often have no idea what they want or what they would do with it until it is actually available. A big, big issue in info-coms of course, but also true at a less intense level in slower-moving markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/more-executive-sense-on-knowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

