<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking about strategy &#187; how to compete</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimwarren.com/tag/how-to-compete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimwarren.com</link>
	<description>with Kim Warren</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Why Most CEOs Are Bad at Strategy</title>
		<link>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/why-most-ceos-are-bad-at-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/why-most-ceos-are-bad-at-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to compete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor Roger Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[where to compete]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A blog post by Roger Martin* makes a good case that CEOs find it hard to simultaneously make a good choice of where to play and how to win. He concludes they need to go beyond these basics and &#8216;creatively integrate&#8217; these two views. True enough if performance were all about formulating strategy, but it forgets that order-of-magnitude <a href='http://kimwarren.com/strategy/why-most-ceos-are-bad-at-strategy/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/01/why_most_ceos_are_bad_at_strat.html?cm_mmc=npv-_-WEEKLY_HOTLIST-_-JAN_2010-_-HOTLIST0111&amp;referral=00202" target="_blank">blog post</a> by Roger Martin* makes a good case that CEOs find it hard to simultaneously make a good choice of <em>where to play</em> and <em>how to win</em>. He concludes they need to go beyond these basics and &#8216;creatively integrate&#8217; these two views. True enough if performance were all about formulating strategy, but it forgets that order-of-magnitude differences in performance more often arise from relentless expert <em>management</em> of strategy, than from unique choices of where+how to play. </p>
<p>He also claims that we do not have the tools to integrate these perspectives &#8211; which is not true, of course, because that&#8217;s what strategy dynamics does.</p>
<p>* Dean of the Rotman School of Management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/why-most-ceos-are-bad-at-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

