<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking about strategy &#187; Global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimwarren.com/tag/global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimwarren.com</link>
	<description>with Kim Warren</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Green Recovery</title>
		<link>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/green-recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/green-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 abatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Sterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mckinsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just been alerted to Green Recovery, another debunking of assertions that it is too costly to tackle environmental damage [notably carbon emissions]. This follows a session I saw from  John Sterman of MIT and the Sustainability Institute, which reported McKinsey data showing 10 giga-tons per year [!!] of CO2 abatement potential that is financially profitable to undertake right now. <a href='http://kimwarren.com/strategy/green-recovery/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just been alerted to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Green-Recovery-Smart-Emerge-Downturn/dp/1422166546/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1251463326&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank">Green Recovery</a>, another debunking of assertions that it is too costly to tackle environmental damage [notably carbon emissions]. This follows a session I saw from  John Sterman of MIT and the <a href="http://sustainer.org/" target="_blank">Sustainability Institute</a>, which reported McKinsey data showing 10 giga-tons per year [!!] of CO2 abatement potential that is financially <em>profitable</em> to undertake right now. John went on to describe the huge economic dividend to be had by tackling carbon emissions - will feature more on this in a future post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/green-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategy and sustainability</title>
		<link>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/strategy-and-sustainability/</link>
		<comments>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/strategy-and-sustainability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capgemini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Hodgson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Bent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Climate Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Environment Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Leadership Partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum-for-the-future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Robey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pangaea simulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarce resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy dynamics solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suresh Mistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tallberg Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cummings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had a couple of interesting contacts on this last week. Seems senior executives in general certainly &#8216;want to do what&#8217;s right&#8217;, but face two difficulties. First, it&#8217;s not as obvious as it seems to know what the right thing is to do [think of the debates about exploiting cheap labour vs. destitution and poverty]. Secondly, <a href='http://kimwarren.com/strategy/strategy-and-sustainability/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a couple of interesting contacts on this last week. Seems senior executives in general certainly &#8216;want to do what&#8217;s right&#8217;, but face two difficulties. First, it&#8217;s not as obvious as it seems to know what the right thing is to do [think of the debates about exploiting cheap labour vs. destitution and poverty]. Secondly, it&#8217;s hard for CEOs to make the business case for doing things that seem to be just costly. We can help on both issues. <span id="more-334"></span></p>
<p>First, my friend Tom Cummings at <a href="http://www.elpnetwork.com/" target="_blank">Executive Leadership Partnership</a> has been doing some good events with top teams specifically on global warming. He and Drew Jones of the Sustainability Institute have taken groups through the <a href="http://climateinteractive.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/pangaea-our-decision-maker-oriented-climate-simulator/" target="_blank">C-roads simulator</a> [previously 'Pangaea']- a decision-maker-oriented climate simulator to support climate policy design [it doesn't need a super-computer, just a regular laptop!]. Also involved in this effort are <span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">Felicitas von Peter Director of the <a href="http://www.activephilanthropy.org" target="_blank">Forum for Active Philanthropy</a> in Berlin and Dr. Robert W. Corell, IPCC scientist and Vice President for Programs at the <a href="http://www.heinzctr.org" target="_blank">Heinz Center</a>.</span></p>
<p>Why take business teams through this? &#8211; because they, like most folk, lack an understanding of the basic but critical issues. For example, if we cut CO2 <em>emissions, </em>we might imagine that atmospheric CO2 <em>levels</em> would fall &#8211; they won&#8217;t. If your bath is about to overflow, turning the tap down [faucet for US friends] won&#8217;t stop it!. We may also think that if CO2 levels don&#8217;t rise, global warming will stop. It won&#8217;t - what&#8217;s already up there will keep trapping heat. The C-roads simulator connects these and other issues to the diverse implications for populations in different economic circumstances &#8211; developed and developing economies, and the poorest. More on related issues at the <a href="http://www.eea.europa.eu" target="_blank">European Environment Agency</a>,  <a href="http://www.europeanclimate.org" target="_blank">European Climate Foundation</a>, and <a href="http://www.tallbergfoundation.org" target="_blank">Tallberg Foundation</a>.  Only if management understands these and other mechanisms will they understand how their organizations&#8217; activities are involved and see why and how to change things.</p>
<p>The thing that sets apart what Tom and his network are trying to do is its ultimately <em>practical</em> purpose &#8211; helping top teams work out what&#8217;s right to do and how to get it done fast, whilst at the same time supporting and even enhancing business performance. I have bumped into some disappointing initiatives in this area, e.g. arcane attempts to model the infinite complexity of everything, and ego-driven back-biting amongst fringe scientists and pressure groups. The danger of both is that they suck attention, effort and cash away from real efforts to fix the problems.</p>
<p>The second step Tom wants to pursue is helping top teams integrate sustainability considerations with organizational strategy. By coincidence, I also attended a reception with <a href="http://www.forumforthefuture.org" target="_blank">Forum for the Future</a>, launching their report &#8220;<a href="http://www.forumforthefuture.org/files/Acting_now_for_a_positive_2018.pdf" target="_blank">Acting Now for a Positive 2018</a>, preparing for radical change: the next decade of business and sustainability&#8221; [by all means download this, but please save paper and don't print it!], authored by <a href="http://www.forumforthefuture.org/user/129" target="_blank">David Bent</a> and others, and sponsored by <a href="http://www.uk.capgemini.com" target="_blank">CapGemini</a>&#8216;s head of corporate social responsibility, James Robey.  <a href="http://www.uk.capgemini.com/about/corporateresponsibility/our_commitment/" target="_blank">Capgemini&#8217;s commitment</a> to sustainability is admirable &#8211; according to their speaker, Christine Hodgson, they decided they just had to set <em>some</em> targets and get started, even if the targets weren&#8217;t perfect.  </p>
<p>The challenge for both Tom at ELP and David at FftF is to help organizations embed sustainability into their strategy, and that requires embedding a rigorous analysis of how those organizations&#8217; business systems integrate with the external factors of concern &#8211; scarce resources, CO2 emissions, waste, and social issues. This is exactly what <a href="http://www.strategydynamics.com" target="_blank">strategy dynamics</a> does, so I and my friend Suresh Mistry at <a href="http://www.sds-uk.com" target="_blank">Strategy Dynamics Solutions</a> are working to help in these efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/strategy-and-sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

