<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking about strategy &#187; Chief Performance Officer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimwarren.com/tag/chief-performance-officer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimwarren.com</link>
	<description>with Kim Warren</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Chief Performance Officer?</title>
		<link>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/chief-performance-officer/</link>
		<comments>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/chief-performance-officer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Performance Officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silo management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davenport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice simple observation from Tom Davenport on this idea, in particular asking if the new role might help end silo management. Starting from the need to make knowledge management [KM] a core of some other function [e.g. HR] people on Tom&#8217;s events have suggested going further and linking KM to business processes to technology etc. Good <a href='http://kimwarren.com/strategy/chief-performance-officer/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice simple <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/davenport/2009/05/the_rise_of_the_chief_performa.html?cm_mmc=npv-_-WEEKLY_HOTLIST-_-MAY_2009-_-HOTLIST0519" target="_blank">observation from Tom Davenport</a> on this idea, in particular asking if the new role might help end silo management. <span id="more-694"></span></p>
<p>Starting from the need to make knowledge management [KM] a core of some other function [e.g. HR] people on Tom&#8217;s events have suggested going further and linking KM to business processes to technology etc. Good principles, but three challenges to making it a reality- the concepts are abstract, the relationships unkown, and the list incomplete [what about capabilities, resources and finance?] .. precisely the challenge for which I hope strategy dynamics offers a way forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimwarren.com/strategy/chief-performance-officer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

