How to Prepare for a Black Swan in strategy+business offers good advice to assess exposure to disruptive events, but misses key elements a strategy can and should cover.

In summary, the advice is [1] map the firm’s operations, supply-chain and sales channels [2] list potential disruptions [3] ask ‘what if’ these happen [4] set up contingency plans. Work on risk in utilities shows several additional strategy responses are both possible and desirable.

  1. Reduce the risk that an event will actually cause disruption, e.g. by investing in resilience. In utilities, critical equipment can be ‘hardened’ to make it less likely to fail if hit by a damaging event. Similar hardening investments can make supply chains, internal operations and distribution channels more resilient in other cases.
  2. Reducing the damage from any disruptions that do occur, e.g. by building in ‘redundancy’. In utilities, stand-by equipment at critical points can radically cut the risk of actual power cuts for a small incremental cost. In strategy, options for alternative supply-sources or distribution channels cut risk in a similar way.
  3. Minimising the time to recover, by making sure the business is not operating ‘on the edge’. In utilities, a small percentage of spare equipment or excess staff can radically cut the time needed to get service back online after a disruption. In strategy, obsessive ‘ratio management’ not only leaves business vulnerable to damage if disruptions occur, but make it that much harder to recover if they do.

www.strategydynamics.com

Whether a skeptic or not, any CEO should check their strategy is OK if global warming does turn out to be real. Who, doing business in Pakistan, assessed the business risk from once-a-century flooding? ? Who, serving the Russian agriculture sector, checked the consequences from unprecedented temperatures and wild-fires? Who, planning utilities’ strategies in Europe, was ready for recent wild swings in temperature and rainfall? Unfortunately, the response of many businesses to endless ill-informed cost-pressure has left them more exposed to risk, rather than more resilient.

The impact in many cases concerns infrastructure, but preparedness is nevertheless a strategic issue, best understood by distinguishing 3 dimensions – damage, resilience and recovery:

  • Cutting the fraction of infrastructure assets damaged by a disruption. A power company might reduce exposure to storm damage by putting cable underground, or more cheaply by using A-frame pylons.
  • Reducing the fraction of the system that is damaged by a disruption. Two cities, each served by a single main cable is less resilient than if served by a ring – the same damage (a break a cable) still leaves both cities with power.
  • Speeding the recovery from any damage – perhaps by holding strategic spares, or simply by having a few more trained staff in place.

Such preparedness is a strategic issue, since it implies careful, detailed assessment and sustained investments of effort and money – the return for which should be significantly lower risk. 

strategydynamics.com

© 2012 Talking about strategy Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha