<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8216;resource-based view&#8217; of strategy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kimwarren.com/2008/07/the-resource-based-view-of-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kimwarren.com/2008/07/the-resource-based-view-of-strategy/</link>
	<description>with Kim Warren</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:26:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamal</title>
		<link>http://www.kimwarren.com/2008/07/the-resource-based-view-of-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=82#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Hello sir,  The whole issue of &quot;resources, capabilities and core competencies&quot; and discovering the sources of competitive advntage from strategy point of view, seems to be a valuable area to conduct a research in. 
I decided to concentrate my MBA research project on these issues. How do you think I should develop these concerns into a researchable topic. I&#039;m thinking about an empirical study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello sir,  The whole issue of &#8220;resources, capabilities and core competencies&#8221; and discovering the sources of competitive advntage from strategy point of view, seems to be a valuable area to conduct a research in.<br />
I decided to concentrate my MBA research project on these issues. How do you think I should develop these concerns into a researchable topic. I&#8217;m thinking about an empirical study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.kimwarren.com/2008/07/the-resource-based-view-of-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=82#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Hi Jamal - the problem people seem to find is that resources and capabilities are so ambiguous and abstract that management teams can&#039;t work out what&#039;s what, and certainly can&#039;t answer in any meaningful way to what degree any of them is VRIO. So I am still not aware of a single real case in which a corporate strategy professional or consultant has done anything substantive at all with RBV. Would be great to hear of examples. 

Having been a practising strategist for many years, I would not have a clue how to use RBV to discover sources of competitive advantage - but maybe I&#039;m just dumb. The discussion on operationalising RBV concerned working out how we might specify these things in concrete and unambiguous terms so someone can actually measure them.  

BTW - &#039;core competences&#039; do at least have the merit of having a clear definition in their original description - see The Core Competence of the Corporation, G Hamel, CK Prahalad, Harvard Business Review, 1990, May-June. It does *not* just mean a rather importance competence - though that&#039;s how many people now use the term - but refers to specific technical abilities lying deep in an organisation on which multiple products are based.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jamal &#8211; the problem people seem to find is that resources and capabilities are so ambiguous and abstract that management teams can&#8217;t work out what&#8217;s what, and certainly can&#8217;t answer in any meaningful way to what degree any of them is VRIO. So I am still not aware of a single real case in which a corporate strategy professional or consultant has done anything substantive at all with RBV. Would be great to hear of examples. </p>
<p>Having been a practising strategist for many years, I would not have a clue how to use RBV to discover sources of competitive advantage &#8211; but maybe I&#8217;m just dumb. The discussion on operationalising RBV concerned working out how we might specify these things in concrete and unambiguous terms so someone can actually measure them.  </p>
<p>BTW &#8211; &#8216;core competences&#8217; do at least have the merit of having a clear definition in their original description &#8211; see The Core Competence of the Corporation, G Hamel, CK Prahalad, Harvard Business Review, 1990, May-June. It does *not* just mean a rather importance competence &#8211; though that&#8217;s how many people now use the term &#8211; but refers to specific technical abilities lying deep in an organisation on which multiple products are based.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamal</title>
		<link>http://www.kimwarren.com/2008/07/the-resource-based-view-of-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimwarren.com/?p=82#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;VRIO&quot; or &quot;VRIN&quot; or whatever we call it, is only a test to check whether certain capabilities can be considered as core competencies. 
It is the job of strategist to discover the sources of competitive advantage based on capabilities and resources. 
I dont understand what you mean by operationalizing the RBV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;VRIO&#8221; or &#8220;VRIN&#8221; or whatever we call it, is only a test to check whether certain capabilities can be considered as core competencies.<br />
It is the job of strategist to discover the sources of competitive advantage based on capabilities and resources.<br />
I dont understand what you mean by operationalizing the RBV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
